深部矿山非规则矿岩点载荷强度指标分布特性

Distribution characteristics of the point load strength index of irregular ore rock samples in deep mines

  • 摘要: 针对深部矿岩在高地应力下钻孔岩芯饼化现象频发、现场取完整芯样困难等问题,选取采场爆破后的岩石与矿块进行现场点载荷试验,通过测试获得不规则尺寸试样的点载荷强度指标。采用指数型和线性型两种修正系数( f_1 , f_2 )对点载荷强度指标进行修正,得到修正后的点载荷强度指标为I_\rms50\text-1I_\rms50\text-2,获得修正前后的点载荷强度指标的分布特性及规律:修正前后的点载荷强度指标的分布频率基本满足正态分布,修正前的点载荷强度指标呈偏态型分布,修正后的点载荷强度指标基本呈标准正态分布。采用线性型修正后点载荷强度指标的正态分布更加明显,其点载荷强度值整体上大于指数型修正后的点载荷强度值,且在等效直径为50 mm左右时点载荷强度基本相等。指数型修正方式所得结果受尺寸效应影响较大,强度值偏差较大;而线性型修正方式所得结果更具准确性。在95%的置信度下,岩样标准点载荷强度指标的置信区间为1.09~1.57 MPa,均值为1.33 MPa;矿样的置信区间为0.37~0.45 MPa,均值为0.39 MPa。由于试样受爆破损伤的影响,岩样与矿样基于单轴抗压强度的点载荷强度指标计算值约为本试验结果的1.62和3.67倍。

     

    Abstract: The frequent occurrence of core disking in boreholes under high in-situ stress in deep rock engineering leads to the difficulty in intact core sampling on sites. In this study, rock and ore blocks with irregular sizes after blasting in stopes were selected to perform a point load strength index test, and the equivalent diameter and failure load of the samples with irregular sizes were obtained through the test. Then, the point load strength index of the sample was obtained. However, the results are affected by the size effect of the samples. Two correction coefficients ( f_1 and f_2 ), including an exponential type related to the failure load as well as equivalent diameter and a linear type related to the equivalent diameter, were used to modify the point load strength index. The modified point load strength indexes are I_\rms50\text-1 and I_\rms50\text-2. The distribution characteristics of the point load strength index before and after modification were obtained. The distribution frequency of the point load strength index before and after modification basically meets the normal distribution requirements. Before modification, it presented a normal skewness distribution, and after modification, it basically presented a standard normal distribution. The normal distribution of the point load strength index after the linear-type modification is obvious, and its strength value is larger than that after the exponential-type modification on the whole. The point load strength is basically equal for the two modification methods when the equivalent diameter is approximately 50 mm. The results obtained by the exponential correction method are greatly affected by the size effect, and the deviation of the strength value is large. By contrast, the results obtained by the linear correction method are more accurate than that of the exponential correction menthod. With a 95% confidence interval, the confidence interval of the standard point load strength index of the rock sample is 1.09–1.57 MPa, and the mean value is 1.33 MPa. The confidence interval of the ore sample is 0.37–0.45 MPa, and the mean value is 0.39 MPa. Due to the small size of the regular samples and the influence of the blasting damage, the calculated values of the point load strength index based on the uniaxial compressive strength of the rock and ore samples are approximately 1.62 and 3.67 times of the test results, respectively. Therefore, to reduce the influence of the sample size effect and excavation blasting disturbance on the test results of the mechanical properties of surrounding rocks, rock blocks with less blasting disturbance and size of approximately 50 mm in three directions should be selected to perform the point load test in the deep engineering site, where it is difficult to obtain intact rock cores.

     

/

返回文章
返回