基于物理信息神经网络的锂离子电池温度预测研究

Temperature prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on physics-informed neural networks

  • 摘要: 准确的温度监测对电动汽车、机器人及储能系统中动力电池的热安全管理至关重要. 针对现有传感器与电热建模技术难以快速获取大尺寸电池整体温度分布的问题,本文提出一种基于物理信息神经网络(PINN)的电池温度场建模方法. 该模型融合电池热建模与深度学习技术,实现无温度传感器工况下电池系统时空温度分布的实时监测. 关键创新之处在于基于实验数据构建电池物理模型,耦合电池产热率方程与数据驱动的非线性映射,增强了预测精度,一个训练良好的模型可以用不使用传感器预测整个电池内的温度分布. 实验结果表明,在不同的恒流充放电与随机电流动态工况下,该模型温度预测的最大均方根误差(RMSE)与平均绝对误差(MAE)均低于0.9 ℃. 相较于传统方法,本模型在有限训练数据条件下显著提升预测精度与可解释性,为电池管理系统提供高精度温度分布依据,对热安全策略制定具有重要应用价值.

     

    Abstract: Accurate temperature monitoring is crucial for ensuring the thermal safety and performance of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), which are extensively used in electric vehicles, robotics, and energy storage systems. The optimal operating temperature for LIBs is strictly limited between 20 ℃ and 40 ℃. Temperatures outside this range can lead to performance degradation, capacity loss, accelerated aging, or even thermal runaway. Conventional methods, such as sensor-based measurements and electrothermal modeling, face challenges in providing rapid and comprehensive temperature distribution data for large-format batteries due to spatial and cost limitations, which hinder sensor deployment. To address these challenges, this study introduces a novel temperature field modeling and reconstruction approach for ternary lithium batteries using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). This method integrates battery thermal modeling with deep learning techniques, enabling real-time, sensor-free monitoring of spatiotemporal temperature distributions within the battery system. The primary aim of this research is to develop a predictive model capable of estimating the temperature field of large-format batteries under various operational conditions without requiring extensive sensor networks. The proposed PINN-based method constructs a physical model of the battery, incorporating experimental data and coupling the heat generation rate equation—derived from an enhanced Bernardi model accounting for Joule heating and reversible reaction heat—with a data-driven nonlinear mapping. This integration improves prediction accuracy and allows for the online identification of unknown battery parameters, such as internal resistance, hereby enhancing the model's ability to adapt to diverse scenarios. The PINN framework incorporates the heat transfer partial differential equation as a constraint within the loss function of the neural network, which includes data loss, physics loss, boundary conditions, and initial conditions. The network architecture consists of an input layer featuring variables such as charging time, current, equivalent resistance, and temperature, followed by six hidden layers (each containing 64 neurons) and an output layer that predicts surface temperature. Experimental validation was performed using a 50 Ah prismatic ternary LIB under constant-current charging/discharging (ranging from 0.5C to 3C) and dynamic conditions, including the Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule (UDDS). Temperature data were collected from 12 thermocouples placed on the battery surface, with environmental temperatures ranging from 1 ℃ to 40 ℃. The results demonstrate that the PINN model achieves a maximum root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) of less than 0.6 ℃ under constant-current conditions, outperforming traditional multilayer perceptron (MLP) and long short-term memory (LSTM) models, particularly in sensor-free scenarios. In dynamic UDDS conditions, the PINN model maintained high accuracy (RMSE < 0.9 ℃, MAE < 0.8 ℃), even when temperatures exceeded the optimal range (e.g., reaching 50 ℃ at an ambient temperature of 30 ℃ under UDDS), highlighting its superior generalization and robustness due to the incorporation of physics-informed constraints. Beyond temperature prediction, the model reconstructs the temperature field of the battery by inferring spatial temperature distributions across a finite element grid, with validation against thermal imaging data. Although minor deviations were observed in high-temperature regions—likely due to grid resolution or boundary condition simplifications—the reconstructed temperature field closely aligns with experimental observations. Compared to conventional data-driven approaches, the PINN model significantly enhances both accuracy and interpretability with limited training data, providing a high-precision temperature distribution for battery management systems. This advancement contributes to improved thermal safety and performance optimization strategies, with future work focused on extending the methodology to module-level temperature field predictions.

     

/

返回文章
返回